#************************************************************** # # Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one # or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file # distributed with this work for additional information # regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file # to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the # "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance # with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at # # http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 # # Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, # software distributed under the License is distributed on an # "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY # KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the # specific language governing permissions and limitations # under the License. # #************************************************************** no-description.oxt, no-dependencies.oxt, empty-dependencies.oxt effectively have no dependencies and should thus install successfully. broken-dependencies.oxt contains a malformed description.xml and should thus display an error and not install. double-dependencies.oxt contains a description.xml with two dependencies elements. This is not allowed by the spec but behaviour is unspecified. In the current implementation, it combines the two elements, and thus finds two unsatisfied dependencies, displays the Unsatisfied Dependencies dialog and does not install. version21.oxt contains a dependency on OOo 2.1 (and should thus only install in OOo 2.1 or later); version21ns.oxt is the same, but with a different way of using XML namespaces; version21other.oxt additionally contains an unsatisfied dependency (and should thus not install in any OOo version). version22.oxt contains a dependency on OOo 2.2 (and should thus only install in OOo 2.2 or later). version23.oxt contains a dependency on OOo 2.3 (and should thus only install in OOo 2.3 or later). version10000.oxt contains a dependency on the hypothetical OOo version 10000 (and should thus not install in any OOo version). versionempty.oxt contains an empty value attribute and versionnone.oxt lacks the value attribute; neither is allowed by the spec, but the current implementation treats both as pre OOo 2.1 versions (and the extensions should thus install in OOo 2.1 or later). maxversion30.oxt contains a maximal version dependency on OOo 3.0 (and should thus only install in OOo 3.0 or earlier, back to OOo 2.3, thanks to the additionally specified OpenOffice.org-minimal-version attribute). maxversion10000.oxt contains a maximal version dependency on the hypothetical OOo version 10000 (and should thus install in any OOo version 3.1 or later; OpenOffice.org-maximal-version was introduced in OOo 3.1, and no OpenOffice.org- minimal-version attribute is specified). bad-minmaxversion.oxt contains a minimal version dependency on OOo 3.2 and a maximal version dependency on OOo 3.1 (and should thus not install in any OOo version). minattr22.oxt contains a (hypothetical, most probably never satisfied) UNSATISFIED dependency with an OpenOffice.org-minimal-version attribute of "2.2" (and should thus install in OOo 2.3 or later); minattr23.oxt is similar, but with an OpenOffice.org-minimal-version attribute of "2.3" (and should thus also install in OOo 2.3 or later); minattr24.oxt is similar, but with an OpenOffice.org-minimal-version attribute of "2.4" (and should thus only install in OOo 2.4 or later). All of the following testcases should result in the Unsatisfied Dependencies dialog being displayed and the extension not being installed: unknown-dependency.oxt contains a dependency without a name attribute, and should thus display "Unknown" (localized). funny-dependency.oxt, many-dependencies.oxt contain somewhat extreme input. license-dependency.oxt contains both a license to be accepted by the user and dependencies. What is important here is that the Unsatisfied Dependencies dialog is displayed, but not the license (as installation aborts as soon as unsatisfied dependencies are found).